Courtney Malick: There are some visual and thematic through-lines that act as your artistic signature, and are easily detected within your recent projects. This includesThese include the color blue, sculptural birds, uniforms as costumes and the actors that you have cast. I’d like to know if they were meant (either at the time, or perhaps now, in hindsight), to directly relate to or build upon one another in any way?
Jasper Spicero: Each project relates to the others and contributes to a greater narrative world. The timelines in the world are warped and branch off toward and away from one another. Centersinpain.org features a character, Judith, who has two bodies. One of the bodies is a boy who lives in a dystopian apartment complex, and the other is a maintenance worker who tends to an empty jail. One day the boy witnesses his adult janitorial twin arriving at the jail. That they are one and the same person is never made explicit. Judith isn’t exactly a reoccurringreccurring character, but to me, the character, Ogden, who is the patriarch of Centinel, is Judith in a past life. Continuity and exposition in storytelling isare less important to me than being imaginative, but there are those few through-lines you mention that anchor everything.
As for the wooden birds, they represent embodiments of grace. Their wings look permanently closed, and some choose to wear special clothing or prizes. I find tremendous joy in giving sentience, history and feeling to inanimate things. Aspiration is a characteristic that I give to many of my sculptures. I hope you can tell that my sculptures are at various points on a road toward realizing their dreams.
CM: I see, so there is certainly a sense of cyclicality that is purposefully imbued into the work, both in the conception of the characters, as well as in the ways that the objects take on anthropomorphized motives?
JS: The Judiths are played by my little brother, Strayhorn Krueger and my childhood friend, Mojo Williams, and they also play the young and old versions of Ogden. They contribute to almost all of my projects. So yes, creating continuity between projects by using the same actors has become an integral part of my world-building practice.
With regards to the uniforms, they are a way of signifying a particular organized world where those wearing them belong. In The Glady Day some of the characters wear a uniform with an embroidered logo that says, “Centennial Elevator Company.” I took that logo from a van in Manhattan. When I wondered what that organized world looked like, I came up with an experiential therapy group that promises to elevate people out of their inner prison. So, instead of a company that fixes mechanical elevators in buildings it fixes the forgotten elevators that can exist inside of people.
CM: Wow, I like the idea of an elevator zooming somewhere through me! So, continuing with my questions about the elements of your work that tend to connect one project to another, I also want to discuss their conceptual links; for one, the test-site-like context that alota lot of the scenarios within the videos evoke. Both the settings themselves -- —which appear purposefully makeshift and are often accompanied by miniaturized toys and models -- —and the delivery of dialog, can feel intentionally over-staged, like acting acting… However, some, like Grand Meadows and Centers in Pain are set in real places. Do you see these videos as engaging with reality, or more with fantasy and fable-making?
JS: When I see a location for the first time, I want to feel like it came from somewhere that has been forgotten in my own mind. So, Centinel was filmed at a sanctuary for the blind in Manhattan and at a convent called MaryDell Faith and Life Center; The Glady Day was shot in an abandoned office space in TimeTimes Square; Grand Meadows was inside of a K-12 school in rural Minnesota that doubles as a storm shelter; and Centers Inin Pain is set at a prison that has sat empty since it lost funding shortly after it’sits completion in 2004.
Because locations are dear to me just the way they are, I don’t change much about them. I am especially drawn to places that fall short of their purpose. They are often unkempt with beams of their particular form of hopefulness shining through. This could be the makeshift quality you are noting. Makeshift is a good word. Like making do.
When I get to arrange my sculptures in these places it is really like bringing them home. When they end up in galleries or museums, they have the expression of being lost. That expression is beautiful. You’re right, the sculptures are small and toy-like. The sculptures are helpers that guide the characters through my videos or at least watch over them from afar, quietly cheering.
I approach filmmaking as though I am creating an experiential exercise for the actors. I design scenes and characters to accommodate the real people within them. “No one can play this role except for you.” That is my message. It is my greatest wish that everyone involved has a meaningful and transformative experience.
CM: I can see that coming through in the way that the actors’ behaviors seem to shift, sometimes even within one movie, but more often as they play new roles in successive projects. Another strong component to most of your video work, which probably affects the way that viewers perceive the characters’ behaviors, is the accompanying sound. I loved the way that you incorporated the making of the soundtrack for Centinel not only into the visual aspects of the video, but also into how those scenes are woven into the video’s actual narrative. Was this bridging of the two a new direction for you? Can you tell me about that process, and how you see the scenes of the chimes session as relating to the scripted scenes?
JS: As a boy I would bring my handheld cd player to bed at night and listen to the same song over and over again and envision things. That is how I work to this day. Everything I make begins with song. I start by creating a soundtrack from a combination of my own pieces and ones that I find.
In 2016 I was researching videos of bell choirs when I came across an astounding thing. It was that consuming feeling of discovery. A woman in the video introduced Las Vegas’ own blind and visually impaired bell choir. Using modified cell phones and wrist straps, the choir members are sent vibrations that signify when to ring their bells -- —an automated bell choir that anyone can be a part of, regardless of their circumstances. Jerry Simon is the person who invented the technology. I am now working on a documentary about Jerry’s life story and the bell choir that he assembled at the center for the blind in Las Vegas. The technology is called Arbecy. I’m a part owner of it. Of all the people I’ve met in my life Jerry is the most remarkable. After making a promise to a blind girl, MaryAnne, in 1977 he dedicated himself to inventing a way for the blind to play music together.
Centinel is about a family of historical re-enactors that are trapped in a continuous loop of soap operatic drama. The film intercuts between the family and a bell choir of blind people. Within the reality of Centinel -- —like when Judith sees himself entering the empty jail -- —time stretches, rebounds and folds onto itself. Two angels communicate from different dimensions using cell phones. Angel Anna supports the choir, while Angel Tim has spent the past century attempting to disentangle the re-enactors from their perpetual drama. The choir unknowingly frees the family when the resonant sound of their music travels between worlds carrying a message of pure love.
Lately, making lots of space for people to contribute to my creativity has become an even greater pillar of what I do. The cast and crew of Centinel expanded to a family of about 15. I am preparing for a new film called The Loving StarStar and I believe that we will amount to at least 30 by then.
CM: That is great. I really appreciate the work that comes from such an ensemble process. Can you tell me a bit more about The Loving Stars, and how it furthers your narrative or “world-building?”
JS: The DVD box description is, “Gang members of rural America are court ordered to take a days long train ride together that was designed by the state to transform violent criminals.” What happens along the train ride and who the attendants and ticket holders are will remain a surprise for now. As the soundtrack and script near completion, I feel a sense of growing joy about my vision for The Loving Stars and realizing it.
To twist the inside outward, to give contour and inertia to the most far reaching corners of the mind, is not only to make art, but to initiate deep transposition. Through such a holistic approach, New York-based artist Ivana Bašić utilizes her artistic materials as substances that synchronize their elemental properties to the sculptural forms that they take. Born in Serbia and having lived and worked in New York since 2010, Bašić has continued to develop the introspective basis for her work, beginning with one-off sculptural forms that evoked more universal characteristics, and over time elaborating their conjured impulses into inter-connected installations made up of complex characters. Such works are often premised on an abstracted sense of primordial matter succumbing to various conditions that are pressed upon it. Exaggerating visions of something as seemingly banal as grains of dust, Bašić captiously imbues her work with a creatural vernacular built upon her specific selection of materials and their reflexive compositions.
Both an anatomical and a meta-physiological focus on the corporeal runs through much of Bašić’s work, which spans a multitude of media, including video, and sculptures in stone, stainless steel, silicone, blown glass, and, predominantly, wax. Sculptures made up of these materials are also at times interjected with machinist elements, offering a palpable connection between any given entity and the broader systems within which it must operate. This kind of sculptural symbiosis that Bašić strikes between kinetic and figurative compulsions was in full effect in her 2017 solo exhibition, Through the hum of black velvet sleep, at Marlborough Contemporary (New York). The show focused on ways in which pressure, over time, causes both the reduction and the generation of all things into dust. The installation featured twin protagonist forms, the vulnerability of whose wax bodies, with their heads encased in blown glass, is protected by large steel shells affixed upon their backs. Each figure’s assured expiration is punctuated by two accompanying works, which function much like hourglasses, titled A thousand years ago 10 seconds of breath were 40 grams of dust#1 and #2 (2017). These pieces allude to the dust collecting inside the glass baubles covering each figure’s head. They are made up of large hunks of pink marble that are locked into tall, stainless steel devices, outfitted with electromagnetic rods that, like a metronome, pang repeatedly upon the stone, slowly breaking down its surface, while the particles of its remnants collect in a grainy pile on the floor. The cycle Bašić puts into motion with the relationships that she forms between these works elucidates the most primal stages of becoming, being and ceasing to be; from malleable wax bodies, to gasps caught in glass, and stone that turns to dust, only to be compounded upon itself and turned back into solid matter.
For her new body of work, currently in production, Bašić explores the process of metamorphosis, through which her sculptures undergo a series of transformations, from material to immaterial; from organic to inorganic; from human to insectile, and from ground-bound matter into pure idealism. In their dissipation, Bašić’s sculptures evoke the idea of self-dissolution as a potential path to immortality. Through this progression, she builds upon this dynamic by using the universally traumatic awareness of one’s own finite mortality to ignite a transformational and protective process of mental flight or escapism.
To see that Bašić turns the inside out is to recognize the kind of inner turbulence, limitations and expansiveness that fuels one’s own cognizance. The self, itself, is thus central to any examination of her work, yet here ‘the self’ is not individualized or determinately human, but is instead an abstracted, axiomatic sense of ‘the knowable.’ We know what we are based on our limits, both physical and mental. It is within the porousness of that unspoken agreement—which delineates the border between us and them, us and another, us and the other—that Bašić’s work seeks to traverse. With every body of work that she completes, she ties each piece more lucidly to another, some connoting the oscillation that might signify a non-cognitive shift, others personifying such an exertion into somatic configurations. In this way, Bašić susses out those underlying feelings and tendencies that we barely realize we are experiencing, as well as the looming inevitabilities inherent to life itself.